The situation in Venezuela has taken a drastic turn following the US military's forced removal of President Maduro. While the world is divided on the legality of the intervention, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) in New Delhi has released a carefully worded statement expressing "deep concern" and calling for restraint and dialogue.

This isn't just a distant political event; it has direct implications for India. Historically, Venezuela has been a significant partner in the energy sector. By urging for stability without outright condemning or supporting the US strikes, India is attempting to protect its energy interests while maintaining its strategic partnership with Washington.

The Key Points:

The US Action: The forcible removal of a sitting head of state is a move that has sent shockwaves through international diplomacy.

India’s Stance: The MEA’s reaction highlights a preference for "sovereignty and internal dialogue" over foreign military intervention.

The Energy Factor: Any prolonged instability in Caracas usually leads to a spike in global oil volatility, something the Indian economy is always sensitive to.

The Discussion: In an era where "regime changes" are becoming more frequent, is India’s neutral "middle-path" the most sensible way to protect our interests? Or should a rising global power like India take a more definitive stand on such high-stakes international interventions?